Buying Expired Domain For SEO (What to Expect?) – SEO Myth Tested

Many SEO bloggers preach for the acquisition of organic traffic by acquiring expired domains. Is it working? Not so sure!

Disclaimer: This is only one experiment that I ran a while back. I am not a massive expert on the topic of expired domains, so check out more sources and make your own mind.

Why buying expired domains?

A quite compelling post by Nathan Gotch shows how you can get many highly relevant backlinks by buying relevant expired domains.


Subscribe to my Newsletter


This tutorial by Koray, also explain how expired domains are working.

What are Expired Domains?

Expired domains are domain names that have existed and have not been renewed by their owners.

Those websites might have acquired many backlinks over time, hence the idea that you could increase your authority by redirecting those websites to your own.

Test Methodology

I was deeply intrigued by the idea, so I decided to test it on a small scale.

1. Found All Clients With Low Traffic But High Authority

I quick listed governmental institutions in Quebec.

Why?

  1. Gov websites have super high authority
  2. They don’t care about their own SEO
  3. A lot of them changed their domain name at a time when they had to migrate to “.qc.ca” ccTLDs.
  4. Many of them were clients

It was easy to find a domain that only has been dropped for a few days.

2. Bought an Expired Governmental Institution Domain

I finally found an expired Gov domain on Godaddy that was a client and that didn’t renew their website after a migration.

I bought it.

3. Found the Relevant Page on Our Website

The Governmental institution had a profile on our website. It did not receive a lot of traffic at the time.

The client profile was a super relevant landing page for the newly acquired domain name.

It had the client’s name as a header, the client’s own description in the context of the page, and the client’s logo.

Redirecting the domain to their own Facebook page wouldn’t have been more relevant.

4. Redirected The Domain to The Client Profile

I extracted all the pages on the expired domain that:

  • Still received traffic from Google
  • Had backlinks with the Brand name as the Anchor text

I made a Redirect 301 from each of those relevant pages to the profile.

Expired Domain Acquisition Results

I have to say, the result of this test isn’t surprising.

Everything was there for success:

  • High Authority Expired Domain
  • Expired for a Week Only
  • Plenty Of Backlinks
  • Easy To Track Marginal Gains
  • Super Relevant Landing Page

Even on a small scale such as this, I am fairly convinced that the marginal gains are not worth the risk of doing this at scale.

Expired Domain Acquisition Results

What happened is this.

The week after the domain acquisition, I saw a huge increase in organic traffic to that page. Most traffic came from branded terms (the client’s branded terms).

After two weeks, I completely stopped receiving organic traffic, coming back to the initial state.

In the same period, I also lost most gained impressions in Google Search Console.

Organic Impressions of the expired Domain and the Client URL

Why This Didn’t Work and How Google Spot this Technique

To be honest, I am not surprised that Google quickly picked up this change.

Purchasing expired domain is a technique that Google can easily pick-up and is mentioned in various patents.

In a patent named: “Document scoring based on query analysis”, Google explains how they may treat web pages that have changed owners.

What is said is that, if Google “thinks” that a document has changed owners, than the document-related indicators (links, anchor texts, scores, etc.) become invalid.

They may discover the change in two ways:

  • Links
  • Topics

Links

If a document changes in a way that is not represented in the anchor texts anymore, it may indicate that a the domain associated with the document changed.

Source: Document scoring based on query analysis

Topics

If a document changes in a way that the set of topics associated with the document, may indicate that it changed owners.

A significant change over time in the set of topics associated with a document may indicate that the document has changed owners and previous document indicators, such as score, anchor text, etc., are no longer reliable
Source: Document scoring based on query analysis

Disclaimer

I have to say this: I don’t believe this to be a true scientific experiment.

The results being clear cut and so close to what I expected, I don’t plan on repeating the experiment, and I don’t pretend that I have provided any absolute proof.

I’ve just gathered the information that I needed to drop the domain name that I have acquired and abandon this as a viable SEO strategy.

Some people vouch that this work and this discussion with Matt Diggity showcases how it may work.

Tl;DR

This is nothing against Nathan Gotch’s work which I believe is really interesting and is worth reading.

One man’s meat is another man’s poison

This post is at best a proof that something that works in an industry, may, or may not, be as good, or even adverse in another one.

It is my little cry out to the community to make sure to make proper tests and stop believing everything you read online, even from credible SEO sources.

2.4/5 - (77 votes)